secret medical manipulations. L. Gunin has multiple links with the cultural elite, famous personalities and dissidents in Moscow, St. - Peterburg (Leningrad), Vilnius, Warsaw, and Belarus. He also has connections with the Western journalists in Moscow, and with representatives of the governments of the Western countries. 1980-s. Because of persecutions L. GUNIN's decided to participate in the dissident movement. There are the main directions of his dissident activities: 1. Participation in Human Rights movement and links with the most famous human rights activists. 2. Membership in underground literacy circles. 3. Defense of the Old City of Bobruisk from revelation and demolition. 4. Journalism and editorial functions for underground magazines. 5. Cooperation with forbidden (or unwelcomed) in ex-USSR NTS (People's Labor Union) and the National Front of Belarus. 6. Participation in the Jewish national movement. 7. Creation of ideologically independent and stylistically controversial music, prose, poetry, philosophy, and historical, political, and other works. 1985-1989. A conflict erupted between leading by L. GUNIN group - and the powerful institution of Israeli emissaries to USSR, and controlled by them Jewish political Mafia. (Their goals - devastation of the local Jewish cultural life, confiscation of huge aid from the Western Jewish communities, and concentration of the propaganda of immigration to Israel - L. Gunin was fighting). He also confronted three important personalities - Kebich, Alimbachkov, and Lukashenko. All of them became top political figures later: first one short before, and the two others - after his departure from USSR (The 1-st one became the Prime Minister of Belarus, 2-nd - major of Bobruisk, and the 3-rd is the present dictator of Belarus). . His attempts to emigrate to USA or Germany - to save his brother's life - failed. All attempts to obtain an Israeli visa for permanent residency have been failed, too. (By then practically everybody could easily get such a visa). Israelis did not want to allow him and his brother to immigrate to Israel. 1991. After his brother's death, Lev started to cancel all steps of immigrating to Israel. He did not want to go there by then. Soon he received an order from KGB to leave his native country for Israel. Soviet authorities sent us (family Gunin) all previously suspended visas. We could not say "no" to KGB, but planned to escape from Warsaw to Germany. At the Central railway station in Warsaw, in presence of L.Gunin's Polish friends, Israelis captured us, and took us to Israel by force. In Israel, Mossad (Shabbak) officers verbally accused Lev in an attempt to sabotage the whole operation of bringing the Soviet Jews to Israel. Mossad approached him several times. In Israel we faced next persecutions: 1) Israeli citizenship was thrust on us 2) Alla, Lev's wife, was abused, attacked, beaten, assaulted, and systematically discriminated against 3) Elisabeth, his mother, was abused, attacked, and assaulted 4) Children became victims of systematic humiliations and mockery 5) Lev himself was deprived in his rights. Israeli authorities denied him: a) valid diploma equivalent b) professional courses c) rights to enter other courses or university d) full and valid employment authorization e) registration with the State labor exchange f) tax exemption as all fresh immigrants were receiving g) welfare when he was unemployed h) proper and equal medical service i) legal, and police defense j) reduction of municipal taxes k) authorization of departure, which is required in Israel to leave the country l) etc. He was beaten, abused, discriminated against. Israeli state radio called him an enemy. One of the leading Israeli newspapers suggested that his works (essays, articles, etc.) must be destroyed. Innumerous and systematic draft board's orders to appear affected his normal life and his (his family) financial situation. During his life in Israel L. Gunin published a number of articles & books in Israel, Lithuania, Poland, Moscow, and Germany, criticizing Israeli government for human rights violations and fascist tendencies in Israel. 1994-1996. With an indirect Amnesty International's involvement we could come to Canada, and claimed a refugee status. To support our claim we presented next types of documentary proof: A. Legal documents B. Documents, issued by Israeli government C. Documents, issued by all kinds of Israeli institutions D. Affidavits E. Letters F. Post receipts G. Medical documents H. Newspapers I. Researches made by International committees and human rights organizations J. Proof that in Israel we turned to innumerous organizations, institutions, police, court, and lawyers for protection K. Our lawyer's documents L. Etc. Practically each statement, described in our refugee claim, was supported by the documentary proof. Only the list of documents' description consisted of six pages. 1994-1997. In her translations, our lawyer's secretary/translator distorted all documents in our refugee claim. One of our two lawyers submitted several messages to IRB in protest of some outraged events. He claimed that the IRB members took advantage of the distorted translations, using them as a tool against us. IRB members used offensive, illegal methods against Lev. They interrogated only him. No questions were given to other family members. IRB commissioners demonstrated their opinion that Lev GUNIN must be punished for his ideological (political) views. Two members of IRB, immigration judges, gave the whole initiative to the third member, an immigration officer, a Jew and - probably - Israeli, who only spoke. During our refugee hearings she manifested an outraged malicious hatred towards us, and maintained close contacts with the Israeli embassy in writing, in our case. IRB members maintained the atmosphere of hostility and arbitrary attitude towards us. Denying our refugee claim, the IRB members not just acted unfair. Their negative decision was not just a refusal to recognize us as refugees, but a declaration-manifest, which rejected the basic human rights in principle. In form of declaration, they denied in principle rights to have an independent opinion, practice or not to practice religion, be protected by the state. IRB members claimed that if government paid for immigrants' transportation, immigrants became the property of that government (a kind of commodity). IRB members also claimed that police' and other institutions' refusal to give protection was justified if people had an alternative political /ideological opinion (even if that opinion was not expressed to police). They claimed that we alienated Israelis by keeping controversial opinions, and refusing to change our views. And so on... The IRB's negative decision became not just a matter of our personal fate, but also a matter of human rights in general. 1998. In her speech in the Federal Court, Mrs. Murphy, the Minister's of Immigration representative, confirmed the IRB members' negative attitude towards human rights, and also widened personal accusations against Lev Gunin, turning the question of our refugee status into the question of his "inadmissible" (by whom?) ideological views. As IRB did before, Mrs. Murphy refused even to mention Alla Gunin, Elisabeth Epstein (Gunin), and the children. The Federal Judge, Mr. Dube, just copied Mrs. Murphy's and the IRB statements, refusing to evaluate arguments of the TWO sides. He claimed that - because in their refusal to recognize us as refugees IRB members used the formula "no minimal credibility", - such cases are automatically denied by the Federal Court. In reality, his decision was made in contradiction to another Federal Court judge's decision in our case, and also contradicted the IRB's final (conclusive) decision. In that decision IRB agreed that some persecutions against us (they called them "difficulties") could take place because we abused the Israelis by refusing to obey their demands to change our views. Mr. Dube also revealed his partiality by distorting some important events and attacking our lawyer in personal. A person, whose name was also Dube, was involved into negotiations between the immigration officer, Mrs. Malka, and the General Consul of Israel, in our case. We could not find that person among the IRB headquarters' staff, or among other immigration divisions. All faxes were submitted to Israeli consulate from Mrs. Malka, without mentioning any other name (s). However, the responses from the consulate were submitted to Mr. Dube. We feel that this mysterious Mr. Dube has something what to do with the Federal Judge Mr. Dube. IRB and Mrs. Murphy's accusations against us were such, which are the prerogative of the criminal court. They accused us so sharp as if we were killers or terrorists. In reality we are innocent people, never accused in defamation, or fraud. In the same time, the way they acted might be easily considered as a criminal offence. We are appealing not just because of incredible injustice, but because the removal back to Israel means DEATH for us. If nobody in the whole world could prevent it, it would mean that if people are deprived and innocent they might be kidnapped and taken to another country by force. It would mean that demonstrative humiliations over human rights, such as the IRB members and Mrs. Murphy expressed, are tolerated. There are rumors among UN staff that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights might be changed soon to fit to the brutal and ultra-religious regimes' requirements. Please, do something for us before it happened! The only way to save us is to help us in obtaining the permanent residents status in any civilized country. That could prevent our eventual removal to Israel. Please, help! Family GUNIN: Alla, Lev, Ina, and Marta GUNIN Elisabeth EPSTEIN-Gunin Tel. (514) 499-1294 E-mail: [leog@total.net] Web Page, dedicated to our case: www.total.net/~mioara/witness.htm Grigoriyu SVIRSKOMU ot L'va GUNINA KRATKOE OPISANIE NASHEGO IMMIGRACIONNOGO DELA PO-RUSSKI Snachala napishu neskol'ko slov o sebe, kak Vy prosili. YA rodilsya v Bobrujske, sejchas mne 43 goda. Moya zhena - Alla - rodilas' v Bobrujske, ej 40 let. U menya vysshee muzykal'noe obrazovanie, u moej zheny - srednee tehnicheskoe. Ona byla nachal'nicej Centrvyvoza v Bobrujske. U nas dve docheri - Ina i Marta, 12 i 11 let. Ina uspeshno uchitsya muzyke, sdaet ekzameny v universitete MakGil, poluchaya kazhdyj raz samye luchshie bally. Ona igraet na pianino i na flejte, a takzhe uchastvuet v luchshem detskom hore v Monreale pod upravleniem Ajvona |dvardsa. Ona takzhe pishet rasskazy i skazki po-francuzski. Ona mozhet chitat' i pisat' po-russki tozhe (ya ee nauchil), no tak kak ni v russkij detskij sad, ni v russkuyu shkolu ona nikogda ne hodila, dlya nee - tak zhe, kak i dlya Marty, francuzskij yazyk - eto tot yazyk, kotorym ona luchshe vsego vladeet. Oni neploho govoryat i po-anglijski, chitayut i pishut. Oni takzhe ponimayut idish i pol'skij. Ivrit zabyt polnost'yu, vidimo, podsoznatel'no podavlen perezhitymi v Izraile stressami. Marta - talantlivaya yunaya balerina. Ona byla vybrana iz mnogih detej Nacional'nym Baletom Kanady, no my ne smogli otpravit' ee v Toronto na uchebu (Roza znaet podrobnosti) - i vse opyat' iz-za otsutstviya statusa. Marta uchastvovala vo mnogih spektaklyah i predstavleniyah. Ee "posluzhnoj spisok" uzhe bolee dlinnyj, chem u mnogih vzroslyh balerin. I ya, i moya zhena obladali daleko ne bogatyrskim zdorov'em uzhe togda, kogda v 1991 godu navsegda pokidali SSSR. V Izraile nashe sostoyanie snachala uluchshilos', osobenno v tot period, kogda u nas poyavilis' kakie-to nadezhdy nesmotrya na to, chto nas privezli v Izrail' siloj, (pazresheniya na vyezd mne vse ravno ne davali) kak-to naladit' tam zhizn'. Potom, kogda nikakih nadezhd bol'she ne ostalos', a ya uzhe poluchil sotryasenie mozga, i zhena neskol'ko travm, kogda neposil'nyj trud ni k chemu ne privodil, i u nas ne bylo nikakih perspektiv v zhizni, i ya, i moya zhena - my pochuvstvovali sebya namnogo huzhe. Tut, v Monreale, strah deportacii v Izrail' paralizuet vse nashi zhiznennye sily, nashe zdorov'e uhudshaetsya neuklonno i bystro. Ne budu opisyvat' problemy so zdorov'em zheny, ih u nee desyatki. YA eshche v Izraile poluchil strashnuyu gipertoniyu, hronicheskoe rastyazhenie svyazok (s regulyarnost'yu v dva - tri mesyaca ya prosto pochti ne mogu hodit'), tam u menya nachalis' ser'eznye problemy s serdcem, bylo podozrenie na infarkt. Boyus', chto, dazhe esli hot' kakoj-to shans poluchit' status u nas est', my pomrem do togo. Ne znayu, s kem i s chem nas sravnit', no, dumayu, takih nepraktichnyh, neprisposoblennyh k material'noj zhizni lyudej, kak my, ochen' malo. Ni v Izraile, ni v Kanade my ne sobrali nichego, nikakih deneg. Na zhizn' nam vezde hvatalo, eto da. No ne bolee togo. Ni na schetu v banke, ni v "chulke" u nas net i semista dollarov. Mozhet byt', my i smogli by chto-to sobrat', esli by ne rashody na immigracionnye programmy. No my potratili astronomicheskuyu dlya lyudej nashego sklada i nashego polozheniya summu. I teper' u nas net prakticheski nichego. Inogda my sidim voobshche bez deneg, i tol'ko chudo kazhdyj raz spasaet nas. YA znayu, chto v eto trudno poverit', krome togo, est' lyudi, kotorye risuyutsya, zayavlyaya, chto u nih ne na chto zhit'. No v nashem sluchae eto ne to. Moya zhena rabotaet na tyazheloj rabote, neposil'noj dlya nee. |ta rabota medlenno ubivaet ee. No nikakoj drugoj raboty ni ona dlya sebya, ni ya dlya nee ne smogli najti. YA rabotayu noch'yu port'e-administratorom v gostinice, a s 12-ti chasov (neoficial'no - poetomu poproshu ob etom ne rasprostranyat'sya) komp'yuternym inzhenerom, a pozzhe - s 3-h obychno - (poluoficial'no, tak chto ob etoj moej rabote tozhe ne nado nikomu govorit') - pianistom-akkomponiatorom v balete. Krome togo, u menya est' nebol'shoe delo, kotoroe dohodov ne prinosit, tol'ko rashody, no ya ne zakryvayu ego, tak kak eto nado dlya nekotoryh immigracionnyh del (naprimer, v period, kogda ya paru m-cev ne rabotal, pod nego ya poluchil razreshenie na rabotu, inache by ne dali). Vezde poluchayu ne bolee 12-ti dollarov v chas (ot 9-ti do 12-ti). I plachu ogromnye nalogi. Takoj rezhim pri moem zdorov'e - medlennaya smert'. Immigracionnye vlasti nashim plohim zdorov'em ne razzhalobish', naoborot, bol'nyh tut ne ostavlyayut. Poetomu o plohom zdorov'e nado molchat'. Vse eto ya pishu tol'ko dlya Vas - chtoby Vy zaranee prostili mne veroyatnuyu medlitel'nost', neispolnitel'nost' ili neadekvatnuyu reakciyu. YA hochu, chtoby Vy predstavili moe polozhenie. Rabota po 18 chasov v sutki, hronicheskoe nedosypanie, material'naya nuzhda, strashnye golovnye boli i boli v serdce - vse eto meshaet myslit' praktichno i dobivat'sya postavlennyh celej. Esli by nas - ne daj B-g - vdrug deportirovali v Izrail', u nas net deneg ni na to, chtoby snyat' tam kvartiru, ni na pokupku predmetov pervoj neobhodimosti, - ni na chto. My by okazalis' na ulice, bez sredstv k sushchestvovaniyu, i pogibli by dazhe bez special'nyh presledovanij! Nu, dopustim, nas dostavili v aeroport Ben-Gurion, i my nahodimsya v zale ozhidaniya. Dal'she chto? Nam nekuda ehat', i ne za chto. My by uselis' na polu v aeroportu - vot vsya zhizn' i zakonchilas'. A Roza eshche govorit, chto nechego vbivat' v golovu glupye mysli o samoubijstve. Ona nikogda, dumayu, ne byla v nashem polozhenii, Sasha Orlovskij nikogda ne byl v nashem polozhenii, on hitree. Y drugih lyudej est' kakaya-to zdorovaya i polozhitel'naya energiya agressivnosti, dazhe u ochen' horoshih, i oni mogut zastavit' vazhnyh lyudej ponyat', chto im nado pomoch'. My v gorazdo bolee tragichnoj situacii, chem vse, kogo my znaem, i my podvergalis' gorazdo bol'shim presledovaniyam v Izraile, i na immigracionnyh slushaniyah, i v otricatel'nom otvete komissii nashi prava byli narusheny bol'she, chem prava mnogih drugih, no my ne obladaem ni siloj ubezhdeniya, ni sposobnost'yu manipulirovat' lyud'mi, chtoby dobit'sya svoego. A teper' poprobuyu opisat' to, chto proizoshlo vokrug nashej pros'by o statuse tak, kak Vy prosili, hotya i ne uveren, chto smog do konca ponyat' i vypolnit' imenno to, chto Vy hoteli by uvidet'. Punkt Pervyyj: SUDXI FAKTICHESKI UKLONILISX OT SLUSHANIJ, PEREDAV VSYU INICIATIVU IMMIGRACIONNOMU OFICERU |to vidno iz togo, chto oni skazali vsego lish' 3-4 frazy za vse 3 mnogochasovyh slushaniya. Dokazatel'stvo - kassety so slushaniya. Punkt Vtoroj: KOMISSIYA OTRICALA PRAVO LYUDEJ NA SOBSTVENNYE UBEZHDENIYA, NA PRAVO VYSKAZYVATX SVOE MNENIE Komissiya ochen' mnogo i podrobno rassprashivala menya o moih ubezhdeniyah. Ee chleny takzhe prosili menya kommentirovat' citaty, kakie oni chitali iz raznyh papok, naprimer, zaklyuchenie neizvestnoj mne gruppy po nablyudeniyu za policiej. Iz moih slov mozhno bylo ponyat', chto ya priverzhenec soblyudeniya prav cheloveka, demokraticheskih norm, svobody slova, razresheniya na lyubuyu religiyu ili na ateizm, zashchity prav rabotayushchih. Komissary napisali v ih negativnom reshenii (posmotrite ego, ya ego prislal na anglijskom yazyke), a takzhe govorili na slushaniyah, chto moi ubezhdeniya, yakoby, sleduyushchie. 1. YA, budto by, ubezhden, chto v Izraile sushchestvuet rabstvo i chto russkie tam prevrashcheny v rabov (na samom dele eto ya imel v vidu takoe yavlenie, kak kviyut, i predostavil mnogo materialov, kasavshihsya kviyuta, eto imelo otnoshenie k tomu, chto proizoshlo lichno so mnoj). 2. YA budto by ubezhden, chto Izrail' - fashistskoe gosudarstvo (na samom dele rech' shla o moej stat'e POCHEMU IZRAILX PROTIV DNYA PObEDY, vernee, o kommentarii k nej, v kotorom redakciya gazety zayavila, chto ot moih sochinenij nado ne ostavit' kamnya na kamne). 3. YA budto by obrashchalsya v Izraile s zhalobami i pros'bami o zashchite v raznye organizacii, a takzhe podal v Kanade pros'bu o statuse bezhenca tol'ko dlya togo, chtoby poluchit' vozmozhnost' oporochit' i oklevetat' gosudarstvo Izrail'. Na samom dele ya govoril tol'ko o tom, chto proishodilo v Izraile SO MNOJ, I S CHLENAMI MOEJ SEMXI lichno! To est', chleny komissii otkrovenno vrali o tom, chto ya prishel na bezhenskie slushaniya tol'ko dlya togo, chtoby, yakoby, zayavit' - Izrail' plohaya strana. O moih zhene i materi, o tom, chto eto ne ya odin, a my vmeste obratilis' s pros'boj o statuse, a takzhe o tom, chto i moya mat', i zhena obrashchalis' v Izraile v raznye instancii i bez menya, so svoimi lichnymi zhalobami, komissiya ne skazala ni slova (eto vse est' na kassetah i v tekste negativnogo resheniya, kotoryj teper' u Vas est'). V etom kontekste sud'ya Buaron, predsedatel' komissii, skazal dve zamechatel'nye frazy (eto pochti vse, chto on na slushaniyah skazal): "Tak Vy, znachit, v byvshem Soyuze byli buntovshchikom protiv zakonnoj vlasti, protiv pravitel'stva?" I dal'she, obrashchayas' ko mne: "A Vy chto, schitaete, chto Vy imeete pravo na sobstvennoe mnenie?" Obe etih frazy byli skazany v kontekste doprosa, kotoryj vela immigracionnyj oficer Malka. I skazany oni byli v otvet na moi pryamye i kosvennye utverzhdeniya o tom, chto my ne mogli nahodit'sya v Izraile i ne mozhem tuda vozvratit'sya iz-za togo, chto podvergalis' i budem podvergat'sya presledovaniyam za svoi ubezhdeniya. Punkt Tretij: SEKRETARX-PEREVODCHICA NASHEGO ADVOKATA UMYSHLENNO ISKAZILA PEREVODY DOKUMENTOV V POLXZU NEGATIVNOGO RESHENIYA BEZHENSKOJ KOMISSII Po etomu povodu imeyutsya dokumental'nye podtverzhdeniya Punkt CHetvertyj: KOMISSARY UTVERZHDAYUT, CHTO YA I MOI bLIZKIE - MY ZASLUZHILI PRESLEDOVANIYA (chleny komissii nazyvayut ih "trudnostyami") ZA NEZHELANIE IZMENITX SVOI VZGLYADY, UBEZHDENIYA I RELIGIOZNUYU ORIENTACIYU V svoem otkaze priznat' nas bezhencami chleny komissii napisali (citiruyu doslovno): "Vpolne mozhet byt', chto, zhivya v Izraile, Guniny stalkivalis' s opredelennymi trudnostyami. |to byla estesstvennaya reakciya ul'tra-religioznyh individumov na to, chto prisutsvie dvuh nereligioznyh vzroslyh lyudej, otkazyvavshihsya praktikovat' evrejskuyu religiyu, ushchemlyalo prava ul'tra-ortodoksov". Tut ya citiruyu s francuzskogo varianta, tak chto vozmozhny neznachitel'nye rashozhdeniya s anglijskim perevodom. V drugom meste chleny komissii napisali: "My ubezhdeny, chto Guniny - opasnye klevetniki, kotorye obrisovali svoyu stranu kak stranu rabstva i bezzakoniya, gde russkih lyudej izbivayut, esli oni rabotayut nedostatochno bystro, gde russkie deti yavlyayutsya zhertvami izdevatel'stv uchitelej i uchenikov, gde russkie zhenshchiny stanovyatsya zhertvami seksual'nogo nasiliya, i gde gosudarstvo ne zhelaet zashchishchat' ih. Imenno v rezul'tate svoej klevetnicheskoj pozicii oni i stolknulis' s tem, chto ni policiya, ni chleny parlamenta, k kotorym oni pisali, ni mnogochislennye organizacii, ni pravozashchitnye gruppy, ni gosudarstvo, ni advokaty ne pozhelali ih zashchishchat'". |to est' v tekste otricatel'nogo otveta, kotoryj ya Vam prislal. Punkt Pyatyj KOMISSARY UTVERZHDAYUT, CHTO RUSSKIE IMMIGRANTY IZ IZRAILYA NE IMEYUT PRAVA NA STATUS BEZHENCEV V KANADE, TAK KAK YAVLYAYUTSYA SOBSTVENNOSTXYU GOSUDARSTVA IZRAILX Snova citiruyu stroki iz negativnogo resheniya: "My utverzhdaem, chto pretenzii Guninyh na status bezhencev ne imeyut dazhe minimuma doveriya potomu ... chto gosudarstvo Izrail' oplatilo transportirovku immigrantov iz byvshego SSSR, a takzhe predostavilo im besplatnye kursy i med. pomoshch'". YA by sravnil eto s tem, kak esli by kto-to govoril, chto uzniki fashistkih lagerej smerti ne imeyut prava na sostradanie potomu, chto Germaniya oplatila ih provoz v lagerya, a takzhe edu, kotoruyu oni poluchali v lageryah. Punkt SHestoj KOMISSIYA NA SLUSHANIYAH ISKAZHALA MOI SLOVA, DELALA NEDOPUSTIMYE MANIPULYACII Primer 1 G-n Iv Buaron (komissar): pochemu v istorii napisano: "izrail'tyane nas traktuyut kak rabov, ekspluatiruyut nas, izdevayutsya nad nami, a, esli my ne hotim rabotat' tak, kak oni togo zhelayut, oni izbivayut nas"? YA: g-n Buaron, vy umyshlenno iskazili odnu iz fraz etogo passazha, tam ne napisano "ne hotim rabotat' tak, kak oni togo zhelayut"; tam napisano "ne rabotaem tak, kak oni togo zhelayut"! Teper' ya dolzhem zametit', chto eta fraza ne kasaetsya vseh izrail'tyan, a otnositsya k sovershenno opredelennomu sluchayu, opisannomu v moem zayavlenii o pros'be bezhenstva. A imenno - otnositsya k takomu yavleniyu kak "kablanut". Termin i yavlenie "kablanut" ischerpyvayushche opisan v dvuh stat'yah talantlivyh zhurnalistok, perevody kotoryh ya Vam predostavil. Slova ob izbienii kasayutsya togo, chto odin iz russkih rabochih, vmeste so mnoj nahodivshihsya na stadione (smotrite moyu istoriyu), byl izbit nadsmotrshchikom-izrail'tyaninom, kotoryj obvinyal "russkogo" v tom, chto tot umyshlenno medlenno rabotaet, v to vremya kak "russkij" uzhe byl na grani obmoroka ot neposil'nogo truda i nevynosimoj zhary, k kotoroj byl neprivychen. Izrail'tyanin skazal togda: "Tut vam ne Rossiya, tut nado rabotat', a ne otdyhat'!" Kogda "russkij" na minutu zameshkalsya, odin iz izrail'tyan, nablyudavshih za nashej rabotoj, podoshel k nemu i udaril ego po licu. Kogda tot byl v shoke, rasteryavshis' ot udara, izrail'tyanin s siloj pnul ego nogoj, i tot upal... Esli Vy hotite dat' ocenku skazannomu mnoj, Vy obyazatel'no dolzhny dat' ocenku takomu izrail'skomu yavleniyu, kak kablanut. Primer 2 G-zha Malka: YA prochitala vashu zametku, i u menya est' opredelennye zamechaniya, kotorye ya hochu soobshchit'. Vy govorite o mnogih incedentah, kogda policiya s vami byla ochen' zhestoka, ochen' chasto otkazyvalas' vam pomoch'. |to vstupaet v protivorechie s temi dokumentami, kotorye u nas imeyutsya ob izrail'skoj policii. Naprimer, dokument nomer 19 na vtoroj stranice, v paragrafe 4, ukazyvaet na interv'yu s direktorom gruppy nablyudeniya za policiej, associacii grazhdanskih prav v Izraile. |to interv'yu imelo mesto 11 aprelya 1995 goda, pri etom ukazyvaetsya, chto obychnoj formoj povedeniya oficera policii v Izraile yavlyaetsya okazyvanie pomoshchi vsem, bez razlichiya ih proishozhdeniya, i ukazyvayut na sluchaj, kogda policejskij otkazalsya okazat' takie uslugi palestincu, i etot policejskij okazalsya pered disciplinarnoj komissiej policii. Sleduyushchij, vernee, tot zhe paragraf, govorit, chto oni ne znayut ni odnogo sluchaya, kogda by novyj immigrant neevrejskogo proishozhdeniya pozhalovalsya na izrail'skih policejskih za otkaz pomoch'. V to zhe vremya ukazyvaetsya, chto eta organizaciya poluchaet primerno 100 zhalob v god. |to dokument A-19, paragraf 5. YA by hotela vashi kommentarii, po povodu etogo dokumenta, esli oni u vas est'. YA: Nachnu s togo, chto etot primer formal'no ne podhodit k moremu sluchayu, potomu chto opisyvaetsya 1995 god, a ya uehal iz Izrailya eshche v 1994. Krome togo, tam govoritsya o licah neevrejskogo proishozhdeniya, a ya lico evrejskogo proishozhdeniya. I eshche odno - Vy govorite, chto oficer izrail'skoj policii okazalsya pered disciplinarnoj komissiej. No chto reshila eta komissiya? Mozhet byt', ona reshila, chto oficer byl prav i poblagodarila ego za neokazyvanie pomoshchi palestincu? No glavnoe dazhe ne v etom. Otsutstvie svedenij o zhalobah mozhet ob®yasnyat'sya ochen' prosto. ya obrashchalsya s zhalobami v pis'mennoj forme v Min. Policii, v Min. Vnutrennih del, v policiyu ( ya predostavil vam kvitancii vseh zakaznyh pisem, otpravlennyh mnoj v takie uchrezhdeniya, i, esli vy somnevaetes' v podlinnosti kvitancij, mogu dat' podlinniki na ekspertizu). Immigracionnyj oficer (madam Malka) snova perebivaet, ne davaya mne prodolzhit', ona perehodit na krik: eto ne otvet na moj vopros!!! Teper' uzhe ya perebivayu ee: dajte zhe mne otvetit' na vash sobstvennyj vopros! Ne perebivajte menya! - YA ne poluchil nikakogo otveta na moi pis'ma. Krome togo, ya prihodil v Tel'-Avive v special'nuyu organizaciyu, kotoraya rassmatrivaet zhaloby na policejskih, i eta organizaciya takzhe ne otreagirovala na moi zhaloby. ya dumayu, chto vse zhaloby ot russkoyazychnyh ostayutsya ne prinyatymi i dazhe ne zaregistrirovannymi. Immigracionnyj oficer (madam Malka) snova perebivaet: "Vot chto nado bylo vam sdelat'!" Punkt Sed'moj - KOMISSARY PROVELI SRAVNITELXNYJ ANALIZ KANADY I IZRAILYA, IZ KOTOROGO KANADA PREDSTALA OTTALKIVAYUSHCHE, A IZRAILX ONI OPISALI KAK POKAZATELXNOE, OBRAZCOVOE, IDEALXNOE GOSUDARSTVO Tak, kommentiruya moi rasskazy ob izdevatel'stvah, kotorym podvergalis' nashi deti v detskom sadu i v shkole v Izraile, ob izdevatel'stvah policii, g-n Buaron skazal:: "A chto, v Kanade, gde vy prosite ubezhishcha, luchshe, chto li? My ne mozhem znat' vseh sluchaev, ne mozhem utverzhdat', chto v Kanade policiya ne izdevaetsya nad predstavitelyami men'shinstv. Naoborot, v Kanade policiya zhestoka, i zverski izdevaetsya. A v shkolah! Tut v shkolah kazhdyj den' proishodyat krovavye poboishcha mezhdu anglofonami i frankofonami. To, chto vy opisali, skorej, pohozhe na Kanadu, a ne na Izrail'". YA otvechayu: "Gospodin sud'ya, menya ne interesuet obshchaya politicheskaya obstanovka v Kanade. My pribyli syuda ne potomu, chto vybrali Kanadu iz vseh stran, a potomu chto ne mogli ostavat'sya dal'she v Izraile. I dlya nas glavnoe, chto imenno nas tut nikto ne izbivaet, imenno nad nashimi det'mi tut nikto ne izdevaetsya izoshchrennymi sposobami, kak eto imelo mesto v Izraile. I potom - ya ne veryu, chto v monreal'skih shkolah proishodyat krovavye poboishcha mezhdu anglofonami i frankofonami. Moi deti tozhe uchatsya v shkole, u nas est' mnogo znakomyh, deti kotoryh uchastsya v desyatkah shkol goroda, i ni ot kogo my podobnyh veshchej nikogda ne slyshali". G-n Buaron - "U vas plohaya informirovannost'". A teper' sravnim eti vyskazyvaniya o Kanade s vyskazyvaniyami komissarov ob Izraile (citiruyu tekst negativnogo resheniya) Stranica 4, paragrafy 2-5: "Izrail' imeet samoe demokraticheskoe obshchestvo, spravedlivye yuridicheskie zakony i ohranyaet prava svoih grazhdan. Policiya nikogda ne diskriminiruet russkih ili arabov". Stranica 5: "V Izraile sushchestvuet mnozhestvo organizacij, zanimayushchihsya pravami cheloveka". Naschet togo, kak policiya NIKOGDA ne diskriminiruet arabov, est' sotni tysyach dokumentov OON, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch i drugih naibolee uvazhaemyh v mire organizacij s opisaniyami zverskih pytok, bezzakonij, izdevatel'stv i nasiliya. A naschet russkih est' tysyachi gazetnyh statej. No dlya komissarov - Kanada - plohaya strana, a Izrail' horoshaya. Punkt Vos'moj - KOMISSARY PROVOKACIONNO ZAYAVILI, CHTO IGNORIRUYUT VSE NASHI DOKUMENTY, TAK KAK |TI DOKUMENTY NE PREDSTAVLYAyuT SObOJ NICHEGO OSOBENNOGO V negativnom reshenii naglo napisano: "Tribunal ignoriruet medicinskie, yuridicheskie i drugie dokumenty prositelej statusa". A mezhdu tem dokumenty, predstavlennye nami, dokazyvali sistematicheskuyu diskriminaciyu, izbieniya, presledovaniya, izdevatel'stva. Komissary napisali, chto nashi dokumenty ne pokazyvayut nichego v osobennosti. A ved' sredi nih byli takie, kak perepiska moego advokata s Ministrom obrazovaniya i kul'tury Izrailya g-nom A. Rubinshtejnom, iz kotoroj vyyasnyaetsya, chto mne otkazyvali v polozhennyh vsem novym immigrantam kursah, ili kak perepiska moego advokata s Gosudarstvennoj Birzhej Truda, fakticheski otkazavshej mne, cheloveku s izrail'skim pasportom, v polnocennom razreshenii na rabotu, s Institutom Nacional'nogo Strahovaniya, otkazavshimsya vyplachivat' mne posobie, kogda ya byl bez raboty. Sredi nih byli eshche, naprimer, ankety iz Nalogovogo Upravleniya v Ierusalime, s trebovaniem zaplatit' nalogi za kakoj-to mificheskij biznes, kotorogo u nas i v pomine ne bylo, v to vremya kak v pervye tri goda vse novopribyvshie osvobozhdayutsya ot nalogov, ili perepiska s Nachal'nikom Upravleniya Delami Kul'tury Tel'-Avivskogo Okruga vsvyazi s otkazom mne v ekvivalente diploma, ili perepiska s administraciej universiteta Bar-Ilan vsvyazi s otkazom mne v anketah na postuplenie na fakul'tet muzykologii, a potom - vsvyazi s otkazom prinyat' zapolnennye ankety, a takzhe vsvyazi s otkazom prinyat' menya na fakul'tet yazyka idish, ili stat'i obo mne v izrail'skih gazetah, dokazyvayushchie to, chto ya ne pridumal svoyu bezhenskuyu istoriyu posle priezda v Kanadu, a zhalovalsya i borolsya za svoi prava eshche v Izraile, perepiska s policiej i kvitancii ob otpravke zhalob v Ministerstvo Policii i Ministerstvo Vnutrennih Del Izrailya, dokazyvayushchaya, chto svoi zhaloby v policiyu ya ne pridumal, medicinskie dokumenty, podtverzhdayushchie poluchenie travm v rezul'tate izbieniya, i mnogoe drugoe. Punkt Devyatyj - MOI ADVOKATY M|TR LE BRON, M|TR DORE, M|TR BUSHMEN, A TAKZHE CHETYRE MOIH KONSULXTANTA IZUCHILI DOKUMENTY, KOTORYE CITIROVALI KOMISSARY VO VREMYA SLUSHANIJ, I PRISHLI K VYVODU, CHTO CHLENY KOMISSII NEDOBROSOVESTNO CITIROVALI IH Komissary propuskali odni slova i vstavlyali drugie, vypuskali stroki, kritikuyushchie Izrail' za narusheniya prav cheloveka, a chitali tol'ko takie stroki, kakie byli im vygodno chitat', i tak dalee. Vse eto bylo skazano Metrom Bushmenom v ego rechi v Federal'nom Sude. SLUSHANIE Vsego u nas bylo tri slushaniya, no ya dayu materialy poka tol'ko pervogo. Esli Vy reshite, chto celesoobrazno dat' materialy ostal'nyh, ya eto sdelayu takzhe. Kak obychno, pered slushaniem - vstupitel'noe slovo chlenov komissii, ob®yasneniya i poyasneniya advokata. Vyyasnyaetsya mezhdu prochim, chto anketa nomer "si" ne byla podpisana perevodchikom; nachinaetsya vyyasnenie etogo proisshestviya. Na vopros, soglasen li ya s perevodom teksta moego zayavleniya o pros'be ubezhishcha, ya otvechayu: yazyk perevoda izdevatel'ski-ironichnyj po otnosheniyu k perevodimomu materialu, s etim ya ne soglasen; krome togo, nesmotrya na to, chto gospodin Le Br?n, moj osnovnoj advokat (gospodin Dore moj advokat dlya slushaniya tol'ko), ispravil to, chto ya schitayu umyshlennymi iskazheniyami, osushchestvlennymi g-zhoj |leonoroj Broder, otdel'nye frazy i mesta perevoda vse eshche nesut otpechatok etih iskazhenij. Krome togo, ya obrashchalsya v Izraile v namnogo bol'shee chislo instancij i organizacij, a ona [perevodchica] etogo ne ukazala. G-n Buaron, kommissar: K etomu my eshche vernemsya! No eto bylo obratno perevedeno? YA: YA ne hotel by, chtoby iz-za etogo voprosa otkladyvalos' ili perenosilos' slushanie, poetomu zayavlyayu, chto ya sam prochel i v obshchih chertah soglasen s okonchatel'nym variantom perevoda. G-zha Malka (immigracionnyj oficer): Tak byla ili net perevedena istoriya oficial'no na yazyk, ponyatnyj dlya Vas? YA neopredelenno pokachal golovoj i burknul chto-to. Buaron: Da. YA dumayu, da... Obrashchaetsya ko mne: zdes' podpis' perevodchicy i ee klyatva v tom, chto ona perevela ee francuzskij variant na russkij yazyk, i Vy ponyali, i Vy soglasny. YA molchu. Sleduet vyyasnenie spiska dokumentov, dezhurnye frazy, obmen dokumentami mezhdu komissiej i moim advokatom (metrom Dore). G-zha Malka: YA hochu vam zadat' vopros po paragrafu 17 (istorii). |to kasaetsya incedenta, imevshego mesto v avguste 1991 g. Vy togda byli na rabote, i policejskie prishli za Vami i za drugim chelovekom, ya hotela by, chtoby vy mne rasskazali podrobnej ob etom sobytii. Koroche, skol'ko policejskih prishlo za vami? YA: va policejskih prishli za mnoj, tretij sidel v mashine. Oni vzyali menya i odnogo iz rabochih-arabov i posadili nas v mashinu. Oni privezli nas k domu nedaleko ot ulicy Orlov. Tam, na zemle, lezhali svyazki ochen' tyazhelyh napol'nyh plitok. - Perebivaet immigracionnyj oficer. G-zha Malka: Kogda oficery prishli za vami, gde nahodilsya Lev Ginzburg? YA: ?n nahodilsya na stadione, gde on rabotal (v tot moment nachalsya pereryv, no Ginzburg eshche chto-to delal). G-zha Malka: I chto on tochno videl? YA: on dolzhen byl videt' v proem vorot stadiona, kak pod®ehala policejskaya mashina, kak policejskie vyshli iz mashiny i pozvali menya i odnogo iz rabochih-arabov, kogda nas privezli nazad; on takzhe videl kak nas privezli i kak nas vypustili. G-zha Malka: V vashej istorii vy govorite chto 2 policejskih poyavilis': "oni zastavili menya i odnogo araba sest' v mashinu i privezli nas k odnomu domu nedaleko ot ulicy Orlov". Tak vot, ya vezde usilenno ishchu - i ne mogu najti dazhe slabogo upominaniya o tret'em policejskom. Est' li kakaya-to prichina, po kotoroj vy ne upomyanuli o tret'em policejskom? YA sobirayus' otvechat', i dazhe vygovoril uzhe pervoe slovo, no menya perebili g-n Buaron i g-zha Malka odnovremenno, no g-n Buaron povysil golos, i perekryl golos g-zhi Malki: A afidevit govorit "dva policejskih"! G-n Mishel' Dore, advokat: Svidetel'stvo moego klient? soglasno zakonu namnogo vazhnee afidevita, tak dajte emu skazat', poslushajte, kak on sam eto ob®yasnit, ne perebivajte ego! Immigracionnyj oficer (g-zha Malka) snova perebivaet, ne daet govorit' ni advokatu, ni mne, zaglushaya svoim teper' uzhe podnyavshimsya do pronzitel'nosti krikom nashi golosa. G-zha Malka: YA hochu zanovo zadat' vopros: vash svidetel' skazal (i vy mozhete popravit' eto svidetel'stvo, esli hotite, no tak uzhe napisano), chto dva policejskih prishli za vami, i odin sidel v mashine. |to tak? YA: eto tak, no... Immigracionnyj oficer snova perebivaet, ne daet prodolzhit'. G-zha Malka: No v vashej istorii ne upominaetsya ob etom. CHem eto vyzvano? YA: eto sovershenno ponyatno. Esli sprashivayut u cheloveka - skol'ko policejskih vas zabrali? - on govorit "dva". Tretij ne imel pryamogo otnosheniya k uvodu menya so stadiona. On prosto sidel v mashine. I sejchas, nekotoroe vremya nazad, ya skazal, chto dva policejskih prishli za mnoj. I tol'ko potom dobavil, chto tretij sidel v mashine. A ved' mog vsvyazi so smeshcheniem akcentov ili iz-za nezhelaniya byt' mnogoslovnym i ne dobavit'; nu i chto, po Vashemu, eto znachit, chto ya netochen ili skryvayu chto-to? Nichego podobnogo! G-zha Malka: CHto eto byl? za firma, v kotoruyu vy trudoustroilis' dlya raboty na stadione? YA: eto byla firma "Kaplan i Levi". Firma po uborke i ochistke ulic. Krome togo, bylo ukazano v nazvanii firmy, chto eto firma kablanskaya, kablan. G-zha Malka: CHto takoe "kablan"? YA: chto takoe "kablan" - ob etom ya mogu vam prochitat' v gazete, kotoruyu mogu dostat', esli pozvolite, tak kak v etom zaklyuchaetsya glavn?ya prichina togo, chto proizoshlo so mnoj ? tot raz, o kotorom idet rech', i takzhe v drugie momenty. U va? dolzhen byt' perevod etoj stat'i, tak kak ya znayu, chto dal g-zhe Broder uzhe gotovyj perevod, kotoryj ona dolzhna byla proverit' i zaverit'. No ya by hotel prochitat' iz gazety, chto?? sdelat' akcent na konkretnyh mestah ili frazah. Immigracionnyj oficer, g-zha Malka, ignoriruet moyu pros'bu. G-zha Malka: kakuyu rabotu vy i ms'e Ginzburg delali v tot den', kogda eto proizoshlo? YA: vmesto togo, chtoby nas povezti ubirat' ulicy, nas otvezli na stadion, gde prikazali korchevat' kusty i travu. G-zha Malka: Vsvyazi s etim incedentom pytalis' li vy zhalovat'sya komu-nibud', kuda-nibud' po povodu togo, chto proizoshlo? YA: sravnitel'no malo vremeni proshlo so vremeni moego priezda. Moj ivrit byl eshche nedostatochno horosh, i, kogda ya obrashchalsya s zhaloboj na to, chto menya poslali na kursy yazyka, kotorye byli dlya menya ochen' neudobny, ya obnaruzhil, ?to bez dostatochno horoshego znaniya ivrita ya ne mogu zhalovat'sya. G-zha Malka: vy ne znali organizacij, kotorye pomogayut lyudyam, kotorye priehali tak, kak vy - iz Rossii? YA: ya i sejchas ne znayu takih organizacij, kakie by okazyvali real'nuyu pomoshch', a togda - tem bolee. Malka: Kogda vam prihodilos' imet' delo s razlichnymi gosudarstvennymi deportamentami gosudarstva Izrail', vy obrashchalis' k nim na ivrite ili po-russki? YA: dazhe esli chinovniki i govorili po-russki, oni staralis' etogo ne pokazyvat'. G-zha Malka: vy hotite skazat', chto oni ne hoteli s vami govorit' po-russki? Perevodchica perevodit s protivopolozhnym smyslom: " Vy hotite skazat', chto oni hoteli s vami govorit' po-russki?" YA: net, naoborot. G-zha Malka: YA prochitala vashu zametku, i u menya est' opredelennye zamechaniya, kotorye ya hochu soobshchit'. Vy govorite o mnogih incedentah, kogda policiya s vami byla ochen' zhestoka, ochen' chasto policiya otkazyvalas' vam pomoch'. |to vstupaet v protivorechie s temi dokumentami, kotorye u nas imeyutsya ob izrail'skoj policii. Naprimer, dokument nomer 19 na vtoroj stranice, v paragrafe 4, ukazyvaet na interv'yu s direktorom gruppy nablyudeniya za policiej, associacii grazhdanskih prav v Izraile.|to interv'yu imelo mesto 11 aprelya 1995 goda, pri etom ukazyvaetsya, chto obychnoj formoj povedeniya oficera policii v Izraile yavlyaetsya okazyvanie pomoshchi vsem, bez razlichiya ih proishozhdeniya, i ukazyvayut na sluchaj, kogda policejskij otkazalsya okazat' takie uslugi palestincu, i etot policejskij okazalsya pered disciplinarnoj komissiej policii. Sleduyushchij, vernee, tot zhe paragraf, govorit, ?to oni ne znayut ni odnogo sluchaya, kogda by novyj immigrant neevrejskogo proishozhdeniya pozhalovalsya na izrail'skih policejskih za otkaz pomoch'. V to zhe vremya ukazyvaetsya, chto eta o